Activity

Let’s consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc’s server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the benefit of having a server on idc, so it doesn’t have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) along with other domains.

Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.

Link hard solutions have emerged good intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.

It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.

If you already had a website or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business’s homepage and also the Webhard’s original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.

It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.

Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the use of web hard has become common.

But it’s not just recently that this concept came out, and it’s true that it is been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many office workers who didn’t sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.

The biggest background of this phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided against the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.

In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.

NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly reduce the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It’s a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.

Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. p2p 순위 As the word “basic” implies, it’s not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that’s significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.

Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.